Legislation Details

File #: 19-9024    Version: 1 Name: Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Contract with Hill & Wilkinson General Contractors (H&W) for pre construction services for Phase Two of the Civic Campus Master Plan Project in the amount of zero dollars ($0) and approve a Construction Services Fee of
Type: Agenda Item Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 5/24/2019 In control: Engineering
On agenda: 6/4/2019 Final action: 6/4/2019
Title: Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Contract with Hill & Wilkinson General Contractors (H&W) for pre-construction services for Phase Two of the Civic Campus Master Plan Project in the amount of zero dollars ($0) and approve a Construction Services Fee of 2.75% to be applied to the actual approved construction costs for the phase two renovation work at a later time
Attachments: 1. 19-9024 MC.pdf, 2. 19098 - CC Exihibit (002).pdf
From
Max

Title
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Contract with Hill & Wilkinson General Contractors (H&W) for pre-construction services for Phase Two of the Civic Campus Master Plan Project in the amount of zero dollars ($0) and approve a Construction Services Fee of 2.75% to be applied to the actual approved construction costs for the phase two renovation work at a later time

Presenter
Andy Henning, Senior Building and Construction Projects Manager

Recommended Action
Approve

Analysis
On October 17, 2017 the City Council approved an architectural design contract with Rouch Architects (17-7264) for design of renovations and additions to the current City Hall and Development Center in the amount of $1,788,245 along with a 5% contingency in the amount of $89,412 for a total of $1,877,657.

With the phase two design process soon to reach a point of needing important cost estimation and constructability review, an RFP #19098 solicitation was advertised by the City in accordance with State law with respondents to the RFP required to submit their proposals no later than 05/14/2019. Six (6) Construction Managers responded to the RFP. The selection committee reviewed all of the proposals and ultimately determined based on the cumulative scoring criteria of all reviewers that Hill & Wilkinson General Contractors clearly stood out above all others. For this reason, interviews were not conducted. Based on its grade, which was the highest, Hill & Wilkinson was determined to be the best value based on the published selection criteria. Staff began to negotiate with Hill & Wilkinson on the terms of the potential contract and were able to reduce construction services and general conditions. The initial cost differential between H&W and the lowest initial price submission (Modern Contractors) was $94,832. Based on negotiations with H&W, their fee reduced just over $25,000 for a revised cost differential of $69,783. In addition, it was noted the two lower priced...

Click here for full text