Legislation Details

File #: 20-10387    Version: 1 Name: Accessory Structures
Type: Agenda Item Status: Agenda Ready - Committee
File created: 9/11/2020 In control: City Council Development Committee
On agenda: 9/21/2020 Final action:
Title: Accessory Structures - Review and discuss regulations for accessory structures, focusing on size, flexibility on required materials and administrative variances. Review of proposed Unified Development Code amendment language.
Attachments: 1. Accessory Structure Review Chart - Benchmark Cities.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

From

Monica Espinoza

 

Title

Accessory Structures - Review and discuss regulations for accessory structures, focusing on size, flexibility on required materials and administrative variances.  Review of proposed Unified Development Code amendment language.

 

 

Presenter

Rashad Jackson, Planning and Development Director

 

Recommended Action

Review and Provide Direction

 

Analysis

At the 7-21-20 CCDC meeting, staff presented an overview on Unified Development Code (UDC) accessory building regulations.  Staff recommended an amendment to the regulations to address the noted issues below.  Staff was directed to review our current accessory building standards against other benchmark communities and draft possible revisions for review. 

 

1. Changes in state law prohibit cities from requiring certain building materials. The City amended the UDC to comply with state law. The UDC recommends materials for buildings but requires specific materials for accessory structures.

2. Grand Prairie has several neighborhoods with half-acre or one-acre lots. These lots are much larger than the minimum lot area for most single-family residential districts. However, the requirements for accessory structures are the same for all single-family residential districts. For example, a detached garage cannot exceed 750 sq. ft. Whether it is on a 7,200 sq. ft. lot or a 21,780 sq. ft. lot.

3. The Planning Division receives a high volume of variance requests each month and the Zoning Board of Adjustments (ZBA) approves a majority of these requests each month. This means that citizens must seek a variance (at considerable time, effort, and expense) when the variance is usually granted. According to zoning best practices, a high number of variances and approval rate means that a city should evaluate the variance