Skip to main content
File #: 19-8632    Version: 1 Name: S190204 - Site Plan -Elevation - ONE SIX ONE Apartments
Type: Agenda Item Status: Public Hearing Consent Agenda
File created: 1/25/2019 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission
On agenda: 2/19/2019 Final action: 2/19/2019
Title: S190204 - Site Plan - Elevation ONE SIX ONE - Apartments (City Council District 2). Site Plan for Elevation - ONE SIX ONE Apartments, a 322-unit multi-family development on 14.447 acres. Tract 2, Frederick Dohme Survey, Abstract No. 395 and Tract 2, Stephen B McCommas Survey, Abstract No. 888, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, zoned PD-383, within the SH 161 Overlay District and the I-20 Overlay District, and generally located south of Forum Dr between SH 161 and Robinson Rd. The agent is Jeff Linder, Bannister Engineering, the agent is James Tanner, the applicant is Chase Debaun, Aerofirma Corporation, and the owner is Rick O'Brien, Campbell-Belt Line LP and Robert Shaw. (On February 4, 2019, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 9-0).
Attachments: 1. Exhibit A - Location Map.pdf, 2. Exhibit B - Site Plan.pdf, 3. Exhibit C - Landscape Plan.pdf, 4. Exhibit D - Building Elevations.pdf, 5. Exhibit E - Amenities Checklist.pdf, 6. Property Owner Notification Labels.pdf, 7. PZ Draft Minutes 02-04-19.pdf

From

Chris Hartmann

 

Title

S190204 - Site Plan - Elevation ONE SIX ONE - Apartments (City Council District 2).  Site Plan for Elevation - ONE SIX ONE Apartments, a 322-unit multi-family development on 14.447 acres.  Tract 2, Frederick Dohme Survey, Abstract No. 395 and Tract 2, Stephen B McCommas Survey, Abstract No. 888, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, zoned PD-383, within the SH 161 Overlay District and the I-20 Overlay District, and generally located south of Forum Dr between SH 161 and Robinson Rd. The agent is Jeff Linder, Bannister Engineering, the agent is James Tanner, the applicant is Chase Debaun, Aerofirma Corporation, and the owner is Rick O'Brien, Campbell-Belt Line LP and Robert Shaw. (On February 4, 2019, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 9-0).

 

Presenter

David P. Jones, AICP, Chief City Planner 

 

Recommended Action

Approve

 

Analysis

SUMMARY:

Site Plan for Elevation - ONE SIX ONE Apartments, a 322-unit multi-family development on 14.447 acres.  Tract 2, Frederick Dohme Survey, Abstract No. 395 and Tract 2, Stephen B McCommas Survey, Abstract No. 888, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, zoned PD-383, within the SH 161 Overlay District and the I-20 Overlay District, and generally located south of Forum Dr between SH 161 and Robinson Rd.

PURPOSE OF REQUEST:

The applicant intends to construct a 322-unit multi-family development on 14.447 acres.  Any multi-family development or development in a planned development district or overlay district requires City Council approval of a Site Plan.  Development at this location requires site plan approval by City Council because the property is being developed for multi-family use, zoned PD-383, and within the I-20 Overlay and SH 161 Overlay Districts.

ADJACENT LAND USES AND ACCESS:

The following table summarizes the zoning designation and existing use for the surrounding properties.

Table 1: Adjacent Zoning and Land Uses

Direction

Zoning

Existing Use

North

PD-294D

Undeveloped

South

PD-294B

Ikea Sign, Gas Well Pad Site

West

PD-383

Undeveloped

East

PD-304; PD-27

Office (Calab Inc.); Single Family Residential

 

HISTORY:

 

                     October 16, 2018: City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan (Case Number Z181001/CP181001), creating PD-383, a planned development district for general retail and multi-family uses.

 

PROPOSED USE CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTION:

The 322-unit multi-family development is accessible from Forum Drive with an emergency access/exit-only drive on Robinson Road.  The development includes internal green spaces, walking trails, a pool, and dog park.

ZONING REQUIREMENTS:

Density and Dimensional Requirements

The subject property is zoned PD-383 with a base zoning of Multi-Family Three District; development is subject to the standards for Multi-Family Three District in the Unified Development Code (UDC).  The following table evaluates the density and dimensional standards of the proposed development.  The proposal meets or exceeds the density and dimensional requirements with one exception.

Table 2: Site Data Summary

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Min. Lot Area Sq. Ft.

12,000

629,292

Yes

Min. Lot Width (Ft.)

100

1,101

Yes

Min. Lot Depth (Ft.)

120

404

Yes

Front Setback (Ft.)

5

5

Yes

Rear Setback (Ft.)

64.26

56.65

No

Max. Height (Ft.)

60

54.23

Yes

 

Parking

The table below evaluates the parking requirements.  The proposal meets the required total parking spaces, covered parking spaces, and garage parking spaces.

Table 3: Parking Requirements

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Total Parking Spaces

498

540

Yes

Garage

150

152

Yes

Carport

100

108

Yes

 

Landscape and Screening

The property is subject to landscape and screening requirements in Appendix W of the UDC.  The table below summarizes these requirements.  The proposal meets the landscape and screening requirements. 

Table 4: Landscape & Screening Requirements

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Landscape Area (Sq. Ft.)

94,393

251,015

Yes

Trees

189

405

Yes

Shrubs

1,888

1,008

Yes*

Dumpster Enclosure

Masonry Enclosure

Masonry Enclosure

Yes


*The UDC allows up to 50% of the required number of shrubs to be replaced by three-inch caliper trees at the rate of 10 shrubs per tree.  The proposed landscape plan uses 88 trees to count towards the required shrubs.

Exterior Building Materials

The exterior finish materials include two types of stone and stucco.  Appendix W requires that a single material, texture, or color not exceed 60% of a façade.  The proposed elevations meet this requirement.

Appendix W Amenities

The applicant is providing amenities from the Environmentally Friendly Features, High-Quality Features or Designs, and Technology categories.  Table 5 lists the amenities in each category.  The proposal exceeds Appendix W requirements for amenities.

Table 5: Appendix W Amenities

Category

Tier

Amenity

Environmentally Friendly Features

1

“Smart” technology to control lights & thermostat

Environmentally Friendly Features

2

Roofing material with solar reflectance

Environmentally Friendly Features

2

Qualified recycling program

Environmentally Friendly Features

2

Walking/jogging trails within the development

Environmentally Friendly Features

3

LED or low-wattage lighting

Environmentally Friendly Features

3

Native plantings

Environmentally Friendly Features

3

Outdoor recreation spaces

High-Quality Features or Designs

1

Granite countertops

High-Quality Features or Designs

1

Upgraded woodwork

High-Quality Features or Designs

1

Upgraded cabinetry

High-Quality Features or Designs

2

Upgraded light fixtures

High-Quality Features or Designs

2

Walk-in closets

High-Quality Features or Designs

2

Upgraded bathroom and kitchen hardware

High-Quality Features or Designs

2

Full-size stainless steel major appliances

Technology

N/A

Integrated USB ports within all units

Technology

N/A

App-enabled functionality for door locks and electronics

Technology

N/A

Wi-fi internet access in common areas


EXCEPTIONS OR APPEALS:

1.                     Variance to Rear Yard and Site Yard Setback: The applicant is requesting a variance to the rear yard and side yard setbacks to allow Building 5, Building 7, and Garages 2, 3, 7, and 8 to be constructed within the required building setback as depicted on the site plan.

Staff does not object to this variance.  The residential buildings are organized around a large open space area that contains walking trails, pavilions, a pool, and pool house.  This central amenity is a unique feature of the project.  Adjusting the location of the buildings to meet the rear yard and side yard setbacks would decrease the size and functionality of the internal green space.

RECOMMENDATION:

At its February 4, 2019 meeting, Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval.

The Development Review Committee (DRC) recommends approval as presented with the condition that carport design meet Appendix W requirements.