Skip to main content
File #: 15-5204    Version: 1 Name: S151202 - Site Plan - 5030 S Highway 360
Type: Agenda Item Status: Public Hearing on Zoning Applications
File created: 11/23/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission
On agenda: 12/15/2015 Final action: 12/15/2015
Title: S151202 - Site Plan - 5030 S Highway 360 (City Council District 4). Approval of a site plan for a 0.65 acre retail development. The site is zoned Planned Development 114A (PD-114A) and is located within the S.H. 360 Corridor Overlay District. The property is addressed 5030 S. Highway 360, south of Equestrian Ln. The agent is David, Bannister Engineering and the owner is Heath Debaun, BLVD 26 LLC. (On December 7, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 8-0).
Attachments: 1. Location Map.pdf, 2. PON.pdf, 3. Notify.pdf, 4. Exhibit A - Site Plan.pdf, 5. PZ Draft Minutes 12-07-15.pdf

From

Chris Hartmann

 

Title

S151202 - Site Plan - 5030 S Highway 360 (City Council District 4).  Approval of a site plan for a 0.65 acre retail development.  The site is zoned Planned Development 114A (PD-114A) and is located within the S.H. 360 Corridor Overlay District.  The property is addressed 5030 S. Highway 360, south of Equestrian Ln.  The agent is David, Bannister Engineering and the owner is Heath Debaun, BLVD 26 LLC. (On December 7, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 8-0).

 

Presenter

Chief City Planner Jim Hinderaker

 

Recommended Action

Approve

 

Analysis

SUMMARY                     

 

Consider a request for the approval of a site plan for a 0.65 acre retail development.  The site is zoned Planned Development 114A (PD-114A) and is located within the S.H. 360 Corridor Overlay District.  The property is addressed 5030 S. Highway 360, south of Equestrian Ln.

 

ADJACENT LAND USES AND ACCESS:

 

Direction

Zoning

Existing Land Use

North

PD-114A

Retail/Commercial Uses

East

PD-144A

Retail/Commercial Uses

West

SH 360

South

PD-114A

Retail/Commercial Uses

 

BACKGROUND:

 

April 7, 1998:  City Council approved ordinance 5888, establishing a Planned Development for single family, multi family, commercial, and retail uses.

 

October 13, 2015: The Planning staff processed an application for the approval of this site plan.

 

November 19, 2015: The Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held.  Staff met with the applicant to discuss the proposal.  The proposal was cleared to move forward subject to conditions found in the recommendation section of this report.

 

November 20, 2015: A legal notice of the upcoming public hearing was mailed to affected property owners.

 

December 7, 2015: This item is scheduled to be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission.

 

December 15, 2015: This item is scheduled to be heard by the City Council.

 

PROPOSED USE AND CHARACTERISTICS

 

The applicant is proposing to develop a 7,200sqft retail center.  The land is zoned PD-114A, specifically for commercial uses.  The following table shows the development requirements for a project in a commercial district.

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Minimum Site Area

5,000 sf.

28,442 sf.

Yes

Minimum Lot Width

50 ft.

116 ft.

Yes

Minimum Lot Depth

100 ft.

250 ft.

Yes

Front Yard

25 ft.

91 ft.

Yes

Rear Yard

10 ft.

75 ft.

Yes

Maximum Height

25 ft.

25 ft.

Yes

Maximum F.A.R.

0.5:1

0.25:1

Yes

 

 

The site plan meets the dimensional requirements of PD-114A and the UDC.

 

Parking and Access:

 

This site plan meets the minimum parking requirements for a retail development.

 

Standard

Parking Rate

Required

Retail

1/275sf building

27

Handicapped Spaces

2/26-50 required spaces

2

 

Parking Type

Provided

Meets

Standard Parking

27

Yes

Handicapped Spaces

2

Yes

 

 

Landscape and Screening:

 

The required landscaping is governed by Appendix F of the Unified Development Code, in regards to development in a Corridor Overlay District.  The following table illustrates the proposed landscaping versus the landscape requirements. 

 

Landscaping: SH 360 Overlay District

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Total Landscaping (5%)

1,423sqft

10,025sqft (36%)

Yes

R.O.W. Buffer from Parking and Drive Areas

30ft wide

16ft wide

Yes

Shrubs

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Total Shrubs

29

63

Yes

3ft screening hedge with 6ft offset per 60ft

-

Provided, no offset

No

Trees

Standard

Required

Provided

Meets

Street Trees

2 Trees

2 Trees

Yes

Parking Area Trees

2 Trees

4 Trees

Yes

Total Trees

6 Trees

10 Trees

Yes

 

Building Elevations

 

Building designed is required to meet the minimum standards of Appendix F of the Unified Development Code for Corridor Overlay District development.  The following tables show the proposed development’s compliance with current standards for overlay district development.

 

 

Elevation Materials(1)

Materials

North

South

East

West

Total

Masonry

100%

100%

100%

75%

95%

E.F.I.S.

0

0

0

25%

5%

(1) - Not including window or doors

 

Ordinance Provision

Proposed Conditions 

Meets

Primary Facades - North and West

West

No

Secondary Facades - East and South

North, East, and South

Yes

Horizontal Articulation Projecting Offset = 3.23ft Length of Extension = 23.75ft Distance Between = 60ft

Horizontal Articulation Projecting Offset = 7ft 10in Length of Extension = 22ft Distance Between = 6ft

Yes

Vertical Articulation Projecting Offset = 3.23 Length of Extension = 23.75ft Distance Between = 60ft

Vertical Articulation Projecting Offset = 2 Length of Extension = 23ft 9in Distance Between = 47ft

No

Principal Masonry 100% Masonry Exceptions: EFIS Max 20% (per façade) Accent Materials, Max 15%  (per façade)

 Cultured Stone - 95%  EFIS - 20%  0%

 Yes  Yes  Yes

Accent Materials  per Façade (Applicant has chosen metal)

7% south façade 6%  north façade 7% west façade 8% east façade

Yes

Accent Stone Minimum 25% of primary façade - West

0%

 No

Secondary Façade Similar in texture and color as primary

Similar to primary

Yes

No use of prohibited materials listed in Appx F.2.B.3.C

No prohibited materials

Yes

Facades all designed wth a distinct base, fild wall and parapet (secondary does not require a base element.)

All facades have these distinct elements

Yes

Cornice extends 18inches

Cornice does not extend 18inches

No

Covered Walkways 50% of primary facade

West elevation has 7ft 10in wide covered walkways extending 94% of the length of the building.

Yes

Glazing 50% of the length of the primary facade

Windows are 94% of the length of the west elevation

Yes

Roof profile for Articulated Elements Curvilinear, domed or arched formations, OR Two or more roof slope panes (5:12 slopes)

Flat roof

No

Color

Low Reflectance Earth Tones

Yes

Articulated public entrances  Entrance Feature extending to a max of 30ft above the highest parapet.  1 feature at required

Covered Walkways

Yes

No garage doors facing the ROW

None

Yes

 

Dumpster Enclosure:

 

The proposed dumpster enclosure will meet all the design requirements of the UDC concerning outdoor refuse screening; a minimum 12ft x 12ft area enclosed by a solid, non-transparent, masonry wall, 6ft in height, with a screening gate that is concealed from public view from all areas of the public street right-of-way. 

 

CONFORMANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:

 

The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan shows this area as appropriate for Commercial uses.  This proposal is consistent with the FLUM.

 

APPEALS AND EXCEPTIONS:

 

Landscape Appeals:

-                     Appendix F requires a 30ft parking buffer from the R.O.W.  The applicant is providing a 16ft parking buffer. 

-                     Appendix F requires a 6ft offset for the screening shrubs.  The applicant is proposing 0ft offsets.

 

The applicant is requesting to match the development to the north in regards to the screening shrubs and the parking buffer.  The north development was approved with a 16ft parking buffer and a 0ft offset for the screening shrubs.  Staff does not object to matching the north development’s landscaping.

 

Building Elevations Appeals

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

Because of the appeals listed above, staff cannot fully support this site plan; however, staff does not object to the granting of the appeals, should the commission choose to do so.  If the commission chooses to vote to approve this request, staff recommends the following conditions:

 

1.                     Address any outstanding comments from the Development Review Committee, found in city case file S151202.

2.                     Submit site plan mylars to the planning department for review and approval.  Mylars must be signed off by the Chief City Planner before a building permit may be issued.