Skip to main content
File #: 14-4284    Version: 1 Name: P150101 - Final Plat - Westchester Crossing Addition
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 12/11/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission
On agenda: 1/5/2015 Final action: 1/5/2015
Title: P150101 - Final Plat - Westchester Crossing Addition (City Council District 3). Consider a request to approve a final plat to create a 55-lot residential subdivision with three Homeowners Association lots. The 16.97-acre property, zoned PD-344, is located at 220 W. Camp Wisdom Road and 5250 S. Carrier Parkway. The agent is Osama Nashed, ANA Consultants, LLC and the owner is Bob Shelton, Westchester Crossing, LP.
Attachments: 1. Location Map.pdf, 2. Exhibit Plat.pdf
From
Chrsi Hartmann
 
Title
P150101 - Final Plat - Westchester Crossing Addition (City Council District 3).  Consider a request to approve a final plat to create a 55-lot residential subdivision with three Homeowners Association lots.  The 16.97-acre property, zoned PD-344, is located at 220 W. Camp Wisdom Road and 5250 S. Carrier Parkway.  The agent is Osama Nashed, ANA Consultants, LLC and the owner is Bob Shelton, Westchester Crossing, LP.
 
Presenter
Senior Planner Denice Thomas, AICP
 
Recommended Action
 
Approve
 
Analysis
 
 
SUMMARY:
 
Consider a request to approve a final plat to create a 55-lot residential subdivision       with three Homeowners Association lots.  The 16.97-acre property, zoned PD-344, is located at 220 W. Camp Wisdom Road and 5250 S. Carrier Parkway.
 
ADJACENT LAND USES AND ACCESS:
 
Direction
Zoning
Existing Use
North
PD-242
Single Family Residential
South
Agriculture (A) District
Undeveloped
East
PD-136
Single Family Residences and Undeveloped
West
Agriculture (A) District
Religious Institution
      
PURPOSE OF REQUEST:      
 
The applicant is proposing to final plat 16.97 acres into a 55-lot residential subdivision with three homeowners association lots.  The subject site is zoned PD-344 for residential uses.  
 
CONFORMANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:  
 
The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan shows this area as appropriate for Low Density Residential (LDR) uses.  The 2010 Comprehensive Plan specifies appropriate density in the LDR classification is 0 - 6 dwelling units per net acre.  This density translates to adopted zoning districts such as A, SF-E (Single Family Estate), SF-1 (Single Family One) to SF-5 (Single Family Five).  The proposed residential subdivision has a density of four dwelling units per net acre.  This use is consistent with the FLUM.
 
ZONING REQUIREMENTS      
 
The applicant proposes a development that is in substantial conformance with the provisions contained in the PD-344 ordinance.
 
Dimensional Requirements
 
The subject site is evaluated against the adopted SF-4 requirements, which are proposed for this property.  The proposal meets all applicable minimum dimension requirements for the SF-4 zoning district.  The following table provides detailed dimensional requirements information.  
 
Standard
Required
Provided
Meets
Minimum Lot Area
7,200 sf
7,200 sf
Yes
Minimum Width
60 ft
60 ft
Yes
Minimum Depth
110 ft
116 ft
Yes
Front Yard Setback
25 ft
25 ft*
Yes
Right-of-Way Buffer
30 ft
30 ft
Yes
Max. Density
5.8 dwelling units/acre
4 dwelling units/acre
Yes
* Lots that have "J" swing garages are permitted to have setbacks less than 25 ft. "J" Swing garages are proposed for the development.  The setbacks will comply with the PD Ordinance as approved by City Council and Resolution Number 3924.
 
ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES
 
A condition of approval for the zoning and preliminary plat was that the non-functioning gas well be capped in accordance with the Texas Railroad Commission regulations. The applicant has fulfilled this requirement.
 
The existing telecommunication tower will remain within the development.  The final plat graphically depicts a buffer around the facility that meets the minimum requirements of Article 20 of the Unified Development Code (UDC).  
 
RESOLUTION 3924
 
The PD-344 ordinance approved by City Council granted the applicant relief from some of the requirements of Resolution 3924. The provisions of Resolution 3924 where relief has not been granted by the PD-344 ordinance have been and will be met.
 
REQUESTED APPEALS BY APPLICANT:
 
No appeals are being requested by the applicant.
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:
 
The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat.  The DRC recommends approval.